View Single Post
Old 01-18-2014, 04:25 AM   #29 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
It doesn't cost anything to repair dents if you don't fix them. Trucks are meant for work, and stuff that is used for work get dents.

What does plastic have going against it?
Problem is a 10 year old truck will look absolutely beat to death compared to a steel one. It could work to Ford's advantage though as in "look how beat that truck is but it still runs!" If buying a used vehicle, I'll take the one that doesn't look like it's been to hell and back, and that resale value means unrepaired damage does cost you money. Dealers repair dents prior to putting traded vehicles on sale. AFAIK paintless dent removers won't touch an alu panel. All potential issues at resale.

Plastic would be a far better solution, but I bet Jim Bob 'don't want no stupid plastic truck'. On that thought he might not want no soda pop can truck either.
  Reply With Quote