View Single Post
Old 01-19-2014, 05:10 AM   #16 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack-Lee View Post
-modified controlbox (no wide-open-throttle enrichment, deceleration fuel cutoff from 1200U/min [currently 2000U/min]
I would love a more effective DFCO in some of my cars. My Fiat will DFCO from only 1500rpm and go all the way down to idle - I'm quite happy with that. My MB100 and Jeep will DFCO from 2000 down to 1500, for the MB that often means a downshift, while on the Jeep it's almost useless as there's little need to ever exceed 1500rpm in normal driving.

Is this something any dyno tuner car do for me? Will it cause any drivability issues? Also, what RPM did you chose for the fuel to come back at?
  Reply With Quote