View Single Post
Old 02-07-2014, 03:26 AM   #47 (permalink)
renault_megane_dci
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France - Paris
Posts: 762

la_voiture_de_courses - '03 Renault Megane Estate
OldContinents
90 day: 44.34 mpg (US)

xiao lan - '01 Audi A2
90 day: 38.88 mpg (US)

Brit iron - '92 Mini Mini
90 day: 45.5 mpg (US)

Prius - '09 Toyota PRIUS Lounge
90 day: 47.37 mpg (US)

Beemer - '06 BMW F800 ST
90 day: 53.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
There is a guy with a Honda horizontal on here and he streamlined it.
The engine failed because of overrevving becoming possible and the norm because he didn't re-gear it.

What I am trying to discuss is that since best efficiency out of an engine is happening at lower rpm, that the vehicle is probably be heavier and with a tad more rolling resistance than a bike, maybe a bigger capacity engine is gonna help on take off while not being too detrimental on cruise through agressive re-gearing.

After all, it is a required hp per mile/hour (efficiency of the vehicle) equation but the hp of the engine could well be a fraction of its peak and gain back in efficiency what it lacks in capacity.

Truck engines are spinning real low.
What is their FE / load (weight hauled) compared to other vehicles ?
__________________
  Reply With Quote