View Single Post
Old 02-21-2014, 09:01 AM   #11 (permalink)
arcosine
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,156

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
I went to bed perplexed and woke up with the answer. It is not more air for efficient combustion as Jyden has said, this is a wrong conclusion.

http://www.oricpub.com/SE-1-1-2-3.pdf

The answer can be found by looking at the bsfc curves for different intake temperatures. See how the curves steepen downward at cold temperatures. Now imaging putting liquid nitrogen in the engine, it would run without any fuel. The gain in bsfc is due to the cold air expanding by heat transfer from the warm engine. This goes along with Nightking in that the engine needs to be kept hot in winter. The logic should follow on a otto cycle too, except for pumping losses may exceed the gain of expanding cool air in the cylinder.

__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote