Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago
I am given to understand that you're actually going to try to make hydrolysis work for you. From what you've been told in this thread by niky, Old Tele Man, IamIan, and presumably others; I also presume to understand that you somehow desire to prove yourself right and all of us wrong. Good luck with that.
As for me - I will not fund your gimmick. Not one red cent, not one thin dime. It is all on YOU to get it to work.
|
I have done all the work I need to be able to apply hydrolysis effectively.
On the other hand you, along with numerous posters on this forum are guilty of speaking vehemently about things you have never done or studied. I am out to "prove you wrong" simply because this happens to be a topic I have studied and done actual work in. Though it is just one of many, it is one I can address. I have seen a mechanical engineer rage on a visitor about Patent Law! Of course he spoke with great authority! Except he was absolutely wrong about certain legal aspects - as one would expect from an engineer. Another one of our posters was chastising the math of another not realizing the errors in his own math logic. The examples go on and on. Can I stop this kind of behavior? Of course not. This is an open forum on the internet so anything goes! Where is the fun in staying within some arbitrary set of rules? But, be that as it may, here I make a stand. You just happen to be included because you commented about HHO, and you commented vehemently against it with no actual knowledge.
I know HHO doesn't work like the scammers claim, but it can work under certain conditions. I would just like the discussion to be a bit more balanced so I have taken it upon myself to provide an opposing viewpoint to the simple one taken up by most of the vocal forum denizens.