View Single Post
Old 03-03-2014, 08:07 PM   #86 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 66
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by IamIan View Post
The issue I (personally) always have with this style of (poorly controlled) testing ... is the leap some people make in what (poorly justified) assumption is the cause of the net results.

I've seen resulted as much as ~763% increases.

19 MPG Car #1
164 MPG Car #2

When both Car#1 and Car#2 were both Gen-1 Insight's.

The route and driving methods can have ENORMOUS effects (+ or -).

Thus the importance (to me) of testing under controlled conditions. That or you have to seriously quantify the uncontrolled conditions.

Even more so when the claims are extraordinary ... as the saying goes ... extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Otherwise ... for me at least ... you just shouldn't (don't have sufficient justification) be making anything but fairly 'conventional' claims.
The University of Arizona did the tests. So your saying there're clueless!
  Reply With Quote