View Single Post
Old 07-07-2008, 01:10 PM   #16 (permalink)
99metro
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296

Wildfire - '96 Ford Bronco XL
90 day: 14.88 mpg (US)

Blackford - '96 Ford Bronco XLT
90 day: 20.26 mpg (US)

Y2k - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 73.98 mpg (US)

Redford V10 - '01 Ford F250 Lariat
90 day: 15.64 mpg (US)

FireFly - '00 Honda Insight DX
90 day: 69.43 mpg (US)

LittleRed - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
No one wants a car with less than 200 HP. With the exception of the Turbo Metros, most all the 1.0L have 55hp or less. It's all about how many bells and whistles can be packed in to a car (rear seat DVD/climate control, GPS, Onstar, heated/6-way leather seats, blah blah blah). The Metro is a simple and affordable commuter car. Who wants that? You can't really stick 24" wheels and spinners on a Metro (the image will haunt me in my nightmares for the rest of my life!). The Metros will lose, the BAVs (Bad A$$ Vehicle) will win. Minimal profit to be had building a Metro, big $$$$ profit building a BAV. In the end it's all about making money for the Big 3 or 4, AND the oil companies.

IMHO
99metro 3/5


For the record, MY metro has both driver's and passenger air bags.
__________________
  Reply With Quote