View Single Post
Old 07-07-2008, 04:12 PM   #44 (permalink)
mrevo
ECO E85
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschool View Post
LMAO, now we can completely confuse the folks here Coyote, when I was doin my vapor carb building in the 80's we had an exhaust heated exchanger mounted directly on top of the stock carb so we could use both the carb and the vapor unit. This was a 74 Chrysler Newport with a 400 cu in engine. In stock form it got 12 mpg, runing hot air(265 degree air) in the stock carb it went to 22 mpg.

It could be that high compression effects the intake air temps viability to increase mileage.My truck is running a 10.75 :1 compression ratio and like you avoiding knock has been an issue. In the winter however I run a stock air cleaner with the heat stove off the exahust manifold and disabled the temp sensor inside the aircleaner, running the snout butterfly directly off manifold vacumn so when I am cruising I have hot air and when I am accelerating cold air; while I don't drive the truck enough to get any accurate mileage figures , I do know the hotair stove helps the trucks drivceability.

Hi,

I agree with this.
I had a 1979 Pontiac Trans AM with a 301 cc engine.
I changed the manifold vacuum hose from the aircleaner directly to the intake manifold and I saw dramatically increased fuel mileage, similar to yours. How ever this created a problem with detonation so it had to be driven carefully.
On newer cars seems to be different with the ECU compensating but there must be guide lines on what to change.

Thanks,

Last edited by mrevo; 07-08-2008 at 06:53 PM..
  Reply With Quote