View Single Post
Old 04-29-2014, 07:11 AM   #112 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r
I feel like this argument is never going to end lol. Adding a gear to the gearbox adds maybe like 5-10 pounds, the extra gears have negligible parasitic loss due to churning oil, but the acceleration is better, the fuel economy is better. The only people who don't want more gears are people who don't want to shift more, but thank god I'm not one of them. Well, actually my car only has 5 gears, so it sucks wanting more gears I guess, but thank god most cars have more than 5.

Just because the gear ratios don't have a 40% spread all around doesn't mean it's for "ricers" that rev their engines too high. Shifting gears is not as smooth on wide ratio gearboxes, and it takes a lot of the fun out of driving stick. If you want to get from A to B on public roads yea, you only "need" 3 or 4 gears, but I'd much rather have 7.
The issue isn't whether people enjoy shifting or not (at least AFAIC); it's that the shifting process itself seems damned inefficient. Plus the other things I already mentioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
Yea, too bad just about no cars have electric drive :/
I thought there were lots of hybrids out there now?
__________________


  Reply With Quote