View Single Post
Old 04-29-2014, 06:42 PM   #64 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,983
Thanks: 24,075
Thanked 7,255 Times in 4,675 Posts
notchback/Beetle

It seems that the VG is intended for the notchback in which separated flow fails to reattach onto the boot,yielding a squareback wake.
The Mitsubishi Lancer suffered from this as well as a Honda Accord.
Successful VGs were sized and spaced with critical dimensions specific to these vehicles.
The Beetle has no rear structure for which to enable reattachment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
In free flight,there exists an axi-symmetrical flow field which provides a jet pumping action behind bluff bodies,which attempts to pump air into the turbulent wake.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
In ground proximity there exists no axi-symmetric flow field,and no jet pumping action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
While VGs might reduce the effective wake of a cargo plane,they have been shown during wind tunnel investigations to offer no gain within ground proximity,as well as many other aeronautical technologies.
Hucho says they're a dead end for ground vehicles.(unless there's a structure behind the separation point)
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ernie Roger's Beetle wing provides a structure in which the longitudinal vortice pair can be burst,and a locked-vortex can be captured,allowing the outer flow a 'surface' to ricochet off.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote