View Single Post
Old 05-20-2014, 10:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
user removed
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlvs2run View Post
That is true for cruising, but the only difference with P&G is the pulse. Compared to a DX, my EX has higher rpm's, but also a faster pulse that results in a greater glide ratio.
In my truck I can always choose a lower gear for the pulse.

3.73 to a 3.45 is not much difference, about 10% lower cruising RPM.

97 Ranger transmission ratios (Mazda transmission):
1st
2.47
2nd
1.87
3rd
1.47
4th
1.00
5th
.75

Basically at 3.00 rear end and a 4.00 rear end would be the same as 4th gear with the 3.00 and 5th with the 4.00.

I guess it takes too much effort for your friends to downshift if they want a higher overall final drive ratio. Personally I like the lower engine RPM on the highway, and if I am climbing a hill that I can't climb in 5th then just go down to 4th or 3rd.

Meanwhile I have a overall final drive ratio they do not have and they are paying for it every day they drive.

When I bought my Ranger I knew the transmission code for the rear axle and much to my delight it was the 3.45. The owners manual says to never jack up the rear end using a floor jack and the center of the rear axle. I wonder how many ranger rear axles have been ruined by those who never read that information.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote