View Single Post
Old 05-30-2014, 08:22 AM   #34 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
To answer the original question, it really depends on your specific car.

I've got a collection of quite different cars and they all require a different techinque.

The Jeep won't P&G because it doesn't glide at all. It won't DFCO either because the RPMs in normal use never reach 2000rpm required for DFCO, and if they do, engine braking soon has you back in the idle fuel map.

The Fiat is petrol, turbo and has no throttle plate, it won't P&G either as acceleration burns a lot of fuel, the CD is poor and it's very light (900kg).

It wasn't until I got the MB100 that I finally was able to give P&G (Petrol with throttle plate) neutral or EOC only, but gave great results.

The latest T5 is a P&G in gear champ

In summary it seems for heavy but aerodynamic vehicles P&G is the answer, but for light weight cars or rolling sheds DWL is the answer.
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 05-30-2014 at 08:53 PM..
  Reply With Quote