View Single Post
Old 05-30-2014, 06:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,404
Thanks: 24,471
Thanked 7,410 Times in 4,800 Posts
variations

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
More proof we shouldn't get too hung up on small published Cd variations; who knows if they're accurate anyway?
I'm not current on this sort of thing,but in Hucho's first English translation book of the mid-80s he reported that a VW 1600 was taken to all the pertinent wind tunnels and measured.There was no agreement between any of the tunnels,but their was a standard deviation of around 2.5% or so,and many tunnels' Cds were within this standard deviation.
The GM,Lockheed Marietta,Pininfarina,and one other tunnel in Europe had the 'best' results.
There exists a standard wind tunnel calibration model which all tunnels are supposed to use.
I suppose that its a GOOD thing that automakers think Cds are important enough to 'fudge.'
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (05-30-2014)