View Single Post
Old 06-02-2014, 06:37 AM   #41 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
ANALOGY - imagine this airplane WING airfoil as a car (lefthand pix):

...or, think about this being UPSIDE down, and think what the inverse of LIFT-INDUCED drag would be (DOWN-FORCE drag!):
Your analogy is false because the GT-R uses it's floor/diffuser to create most of it's downforce which is basically 'drag free', and why underbody downforce is always so heavily policed in racing.

A diffuser's typical lift to drag is 10:1 and can even reduce drag while still generating modest downforce

Compared to a rear wing's typical 3:1. Front wings on open wheel cars can be as low as 10:1, but that's because they're basically front mounted diffusers.

__________________






  Reply With Quote