View Single Post
Old 07-11-2008, 09:40 AM   #54 (permalink)
MazdaMatt
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,096

2k2Prot5 - '02 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 33.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Yeah, that would be crazy. You would increasing the horsepower needed to cruise and that leads directly to more fuel used.
Not according to that graph. That graph says that at 1500 rpm and a higher thottle position than your 1000rpm point, you will be using less fuel. Otherwise, I need these charts better explained to me.


EDIT: OOOOHHHHH... nevermind!!! I didn't realize it was per kW.H. I thought it was per hour. Nevermind. I understand now why the idea was as stupid as i first though it was. So this tells me that hard accel in that sweet spot may not be the most efficient. I want to see fuel per hour islands for tp vs. tq.

Last edited by MazdaMatt; 07-11-2008 at 09:49 AM..
  Reply With Quote