View Single Post
Old 06-18-2014, 09:28 PM   #19 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Does this mean GPS readings do not show elevation changes that would affect distance travelled, something I had wondered about.
I believe this is the case. In the real world most trips are A-B-A so it will usually average out. Even my super expensive 'high accuracy' $700 GPS doesn't do elevations very well.

On the other hand, if the elevation is 200m out, it's a lot if you're measuring elevation, but not really much when you're measuring a road trip distance.

This can be tested by comparing speedo error going up hill vs down. You'd need a SG or other digital read out to compare the GPS to.
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 06-18-2014 at 09:38 PM..
  Reply With Quote