View Single Post
Old 06-20-2014, 08:32 AM   #29 (permalink)
benphyr
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 101

Asphault Camo - retired - '05 Honda Civic SE
90 day: 35.81 mpg (US)

Asphault Camo Kid hauler - '98 Honda Odyssey LX
90 day: 24.33 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Graph numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post



The fuel economy improvement between unmodified (C) to modified (A) was 4.5 % @ 90 km/h / 56 mph based on these numbers.

A1 - 57.15 mpg US (average of 2-way run)
A2 - 56.8
B1 - 56.1
B2 - 56.15
C1 - 53.7
C2 - 55.0
C3 - 54.8
Metro,

Thank you for the excellent work and for sharing with us all.

A few questions: Who would let you borrow a Mirage for a week? You don't have to answer that, I'm just curious and sounding a big "Thank you!" to whoever it is.

The numbers below the graph and the bars on the graph match but the metric numbers added to the graph conflict... is that just an error in those metric numbers? Which is the original data?

Just for clarification: Correct me if I have misunderstood. Those numbers are numbers for a steady speed run, for comparison of modifications, right? (But they do not correlate directly to overall driving averages or to sticker mileage, right?)

Benphyr
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to benphyr For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-16-2014), MetroMPG (06-20-2014)