View Single Post
Old 07-01-2014, 01:21 AM   #25 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobb View Post
Run Data:

Acceleration Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg. MPG Avg. Gallons Used
Slow (~1800rpm) 28.6 27 28.4 26.6 27.65 0.036
Med. (~3300rpm) 24.9 23.2 25.2 24.43 0.041
Fast (5000+ rpm) 19.9 21.3 21.1 20.77 0.048
I would argue that 1800rpm isn't 'slow' acceleration, that's actually probably around BSFC. The argument for accelerating 'fast' isn't to rev to 5000+ RPM, its' actually to use high loads to accelerate.

We know more RPM will use more fuel.

The real issue is shifting at the same RPM but varying the throttle opening. I've always found heavy foot low rpm (~2000) to work the best (carb, EFI, petrol, diesel, NA, or turbo it's always worked). Most people trying to save fuel are afraid of using the accelerator when they shouldn't. Although light throttle doesn't 'waste' fuel, if you can move faster for no economy penalty you might as well. I think this point would bring hypermilling to the interest of a lot more people too.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
ecomodded (07-02-2014)