View Single Post
Old 07-09-2014, 02:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
RustyLugNut
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
I have worked with HHO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lethedethius View Post

Back to my original discussion-has anyone done this with negative or positive results?
There have been both positive and negative results as far as fuel efficiency. Measured gains have been a percentage range as have measured losses. No "doubling of fuel economy" or factors there about. And, it is not as simple as the HHO aficionados make it out to be.

I have only applied it in passing to half a dozen vehicles/engines to ascertain the parameters of a hydrogen augmented combustion engine so I can't say my information is extensive.

The bottom line is that considerable work will need to be done to gain a 5-15% advantage. An outlier engine returned 30-50% with HHO but that was in conjunction with added intake heat, mixture turbulence and lean combustion mixtures at relatively low engine revolution rates.

As a means to reduce your fuel bill, HHO is an expensive path to follow based on the returns. If you want to experiment and enjoy the challenge of it, then by all means, go for it.
  Reply With Quote