View Single Post
Old 07-11-2014, 10:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
IMHO the schnozz is far more protruding than needed. It may also prove a hindrance for obstacle clearance and maybe parking. At the tail I would think the wake zone AREA as pictured is the same as stock but the quality of the aft flow should be better. IMHO "Kamming" it down to a smaller cross sectional area at the rear will bring greater gains. Otherwise lookin' good!

Don't do this:



Long schnozz, big butt, didn't seem to help.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 07-11-2014 at 10:12 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Cd (08-27-2014), whatmaycome14 (08-26-2014)