View Single Post
Old 07-12-2014, 09:13 AM   #22 (permalink)
CapriRacer
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lasitter View Post
The report is old and the data is older. Until I see CRR data from different sizes of tires by the same tire maker / same class, I will remain unimpressed.

The CRR for every tire of every size should be readily available to us as consumers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_ro...esistance_tire

"... 2003 California Energy Commission (CEC) preliminary study" ... some of this data may be 11 years old. I think it's a disgrace that we don't have better data, and the primary reason is that people who make and sell tires don't want us to have it.

1) The fact that the data is old doesn't mean it is invalid.

2) That data is the only data that is available - and it is likely that there will not be new data any time soon.

3) And the data IS of the same tire line - as best as I can tell.

So: "Bigger is Better"

But to answer the original question: Yes, a wider tread generally means more RR.

- BUT -

All other things have to be equal.

When you change tire diameter, you've changed more than just diameter. You also changed load carrying capacity - and load carrying capacity has a major affect on RR.

And as I point out on the web page: There are HUGE!!! differences between tires. Tire size is NOT a big factor in RR.

And while you may be thinking that measuring tread width gives you some insight into fuel economy, the material properties of the rubber itself have a much larger effect. In other words, measuring tread widths is enough information.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote