What are "global warming emissions" if global warming doesn't even exist by the models some people are selling? You see what I'm talking about? Just because you see nice charts on the internet doesn't mean the "science" behind them isn't tweaked to produce a certain outcome. The obvious thing that immediately stands out is it appears these charts are only talking about air pollution. So just getting back to the catalytic converter thing, all the heavy metal pollution slowing being deposited alongside the roads and highways means nothing nor do the massive toxic mines in Russia. So what do these studies leave out to try and move an agenda? Maybe not much, but obfuscate or obscure ANYTHING and it ceases to be science.
|