This is the source for the article which is more in depth. Its from the "union of concerned scientists," and doesn't have a positive or negative EV bias. It's not published by nut jobs with no back ground in global warming who are among the 0.5% of "scientists" who don't believe in global warming. I stand by it because i've read the entire report, and cross referenced many of the important facts from other sources. It's as real as science gets.
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documen...ons-report.pdf