View Single Post
Old 08-15-2014, 06:45 PM   #57 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
Not even

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatmaycome14 View Post
Not even front skirts?
I was sharing some data with serial11r:
*The 'bulged',frontal area-adding,front skirts on the 1936 Jaray Adler were only good for a 1% drag reduction.However,with the rear skirts the car saw an overall 13.6% drag reduction.
*The 'flush' front skirts on the 1983 Ford Probe-IV contributed to a 9% reduction.
That's quite a spread.
Since the lowest drag cars have skirts,it kinda infers that we 'want to go there'.
Hucho cites work by Cogotti on wheelhouse drag.
Fiat separated out the wheelhouse drag in a paper they published.
The numbers are scattered,but there's a trend towards drag reduction.
The cleaner the car,the more important they become.Wheel drag constitutes 1/2 the drag of a low-drag car.
Here is the Cd 0.12 Honda Dream-1,with non-enclosed wheels.

Here is the Cd 0.10 Cambridge University CUER solar racer with fully-enclosed wheels.

HOT ROD Magazine's Camaro would have run faster with shielded wheels,but the rulebook forbids it.When you get into the enclosed-wheel streamliner class,you really see some velocity
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (09-26-2014)