View Single Post
Old 09-14-2014, 02:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
skyking
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
Increasing frontal area and reducing drag

I have been kicking around my travel trailer design for years now, and like all things it has gone through several changes. it is a good thing I have not started construction yet!!

Here are the nuts and bolts of the latest changes.
before, I was committed to the lowest possible frontal area while keeping certain interior size goals.
This meant compromises in the shape, compromises that would not produce the lowest possible CD.
Now I see the folly in that approach.
If I increase the area from 60 to 64, for example, it means a change of around 7%.
If the new shape, (which still meets the interior size goals ), improves the CD from .30 to .27 I have made an overall improvement in CDa.
If it goes from .30 to .23 I have made some serious improvement.
Basically the more I can do to match up with the template the more I can gain, regardless of increase in frontal area.

__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to skyking For This Useful Post:
Hersbird (09-15-2014)