Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmick
Sorry, false. I can prove the 31, you can't prove 21, because it never was.
|
I linked my source, which you seem to have ignored. Here it is:
Apparently, by "GM," you meant Chevrolet, not GMC. I understand that it is mostly a matter of badging, but their EPA ratings differ. Here is just the Chevrolet pickup's ratings:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000mc
Where does the 31 figure come from?
Fueleconomy.gov puts an '84 at 22mpg
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmick
|
Is that for the 1986 S-10? The S-10 was what you called full-sized? How does the 2.8L engine prove the fuel efficiency of a 2.8L diesel from three years previous?
I am not trying to argue or insult. Had the EPA said 31 MPG, I would have posted that to support you. In these forums, members expect people to support claims. Instead of asking for your source, I looked it up. If you can support the 1983 6.2L diesel being rated 31 MPG, I will happily delete all of my responses. If you start your own thread about the 1983 31 MPG 6.2L diesel, I will move my messages there, and we can clean up this thread.