One thing not mentioned here is reliability.
Honda is known for manufacturing reliable vehicles, and it appears the Ridgeline is no exception.
While I'm not an expert in the reliability of other trucks such as the Ranger or Dakota, I have experience with my own full-size Dodge that every little part likes to break, with the exception of the Cummins engine.
Perhaps people that want a small and reliable pickup choose the Ridgeline, despite the mediocre fuel economy. I'd never get one, but then again, I often wonder what motivated people to purchase 95% of the silly vehicles you find on the road.
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane
Now who is underestimating?
Fuel economy:
'87 Elky rated up to 16/22 Compare Side-by-Side
'15 Ridgeline rated up to 15/21 Compare Side-by-Side
Tow rating? '87 Elky rated at up to.... 5000lbs. 5.0L, with a weight-distributing hitch, Chevrolet rated it at 5000lbs in their Recreation and Towing guide. |
The 3.8L V6 in the '87 El Camino only output 110 HP. My 0.6L motorcycle has the same power output.
The 5.0L V8 output 150 HP, compared to the Ridgeline's 3.5L V6 with 250 HP. Which would I rather tow 5,000lbs with?
As you pointed out, it's ridiculous to compare a 30 year old vehicle with a modern one.