View Single Post
Old 09-27-2014, 12:17 PM   #51 (permalink)
Big time
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERTW View Post
It's not so much that they need that much downforce at 250 mph. They want usable downforce at 100 mph and they happen to have enough hp to go 250. The faster you go, the lower the Lift coefficient you need. ie. 100 lb will keep the car on the ground regardless of speed.
So right.
I guess that explains it all.

Race regulations forbid actively variable aerodynamics.
Many supercar manufacturers race or provide extensive help to those who race.

While there are no rules limiting active aerodynamics on road cars I think the designers are psychologically stuck with racing rules requiring fixed aerodynamics.

In the 90s I was a little kid who was astonished with the Lamborghini Countach successor the Diablo.
If it had a rear wing it couldn't reach the record breaking 202 mph. I just couldn't believe Lamborghini designers were so stupid as not to place a retractable wing on it.
The fact that retractable wings took about 20 years to be widely used in supercars shows how much designers are focused on fixed aerodynamic regulations.
Maybe they still expect supercars to be modified and raced?
Maybe they are pressured to leave room for racing mods for Marque bragging rights?
This happens despite the fact that most top-end supercars are deemed to expensive to race.
Only the McLaren F1 raced. AFAIK no Bugatti Veyron ever raced at least not in really competitive races with tight rules.

  Reply With Quote