View Single Post
Old 10-22-2014, 03:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
You linked the video, but not your site, which is weird.

Quote:
It reduces your fuel bill by ± 20%
I really think that you wanted to say "It reduces your fuel bill by ≥ 20%." Also, your video states at 1:12 "The vehicle in the video is a diesel Hyundai H100 truck, initial range was 450km per tank now the range is 550km per tank. That is a 122% improvement."

550 / 450 = 122%. However, 100% is the baseline, so it is a 22% improvement, which is more or less what you state elsewhere.

Effectively, you state that this forces the driver to maintain the speed limit while they would use 20% more fuel speeding. Here is a MPH vs. MPG chart:

Prius v Versus Ford C-Max Hybrid: Comparing Real-World Fuel Economy

According to that chart, slowing from 70 MPH to 65 increases fuel economy by 13% and dropping from 70 to 60 improves MPG by 24%, so driving 10% slower results in ≈ 20% improvement.

Quote:
Research by one of the major car manufacturers has shown that driver behaviour influences fuel usage by up to 30%.
Guys?



So, this is a rev limiter? I remember a suggestion on here about installing a block under the gas pedal in the wife's car. Yes, not speeding saves money, but I believe the common consensus on these forums is that accelerating at a greater percentage of Wide Open Throttle uses less fuel than accelerating slower, and then you spend a longer time at your driving speed.
  Reply With Quote