View Single Post
Old 10-30-2014, 04:40 PM   #17 (permalink)
S Keith
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
Posts: 318
Thanks: 19
Thanked 181 Times in 126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
"Easy math" often means you are doing it wrong.

You need to pay attention when working with percentages. A 7% increase of 20% is not 27% but 21.4% (Multiply by 1.07 not add 7%).

If the claims are close to accurate for emissions and wear, it's because of improved warm-up times as Ecky stated. However, just one high RPM romp with 300°F oil could easily negate all reduction in wear...
My easy math was way harder than the math used for those numbers

I understand the percentages, easy math was used for illustrative purposes to try and explain those numbers. I took it a bit far.

I don't understand how those claims could be made if they only apply to the warm-up phase. Is it safe to say that a car is fully warmed-up in the first couple miles? After the first couple miles, wouldn't the benefit be negated?

Steve
  Reply With Quote