View Single Post
Old 11-13-2014, 06:53 AM   #25 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobdbilder View Post
If you ever tried cycling and moved from Aluminium Mountain Bikes to Aluminium Road Bikes, you would feel a very big difference in terms of distance and speed that you could generate.
Except that weight is actually a minor part of that comparison. I've got a MTB that's as light as a low end road bike and it's very near as fast. Most of the difference in road vs MTB down to riding position (aero - but also power generated), gearing (taller gears on the road bike), and the narrow high pressure tyres. My brother has an MTB on high pressure road tyres and although it's a bit on the heavy side, with aerobars it's really fast, but not as fast as my 7kg aero framed carbon bike

The time weight most makes itself felt is climbing hills, which is where ICE vehicles and human powered differ. More weight in a car means you'll be running closer to BSFC, while humans don't like 80% load very much
__________________






  Reply With Quote