View Single Post
Old 11-13-2014, 06:25 PM   #28 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,461

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
I read about a road bike so light that they actually needed to add weights to it for competitions. What is the point? I guess that if you add five pounds below the crank you would have negligibly better center of gravity than a bike that originally weighed that much, but so what?
That's done in most racing sports. Jockys often weigh under the minimum weight for a horse, so they will add ballast. There is an advantage to choosing where weight will go, even if it's small.

...and I was joking about running without doors on a Jeep. There is no chance that CF door fuel savings could be measured. It's such an insignificant place to look when considering how to improve fuel efficiency.

I've linked this before, but this guy went to extreme measures to reduce vehicle weight, and still didn't go with CF doors.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
niky (11-13-2014), Xist (11-13-2014)