View Single Post
Old 11-15-2014, 07:34 AM   #14 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 453 Times in 320 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysler kid View Post
What I've always heard is that it takes more fuel to start the car than to let it idle,
From an old wife perhaps? BMW and Ford claim the break even point is 3 and 5 seconds for their stop start systems.

Funnily enough, the starter and alternator have about the same rating on most cars, if you have an 80A starter, you'll have somewhere around an 80A alternator. This means if you run the starter for 2 seconds to start the engine, the alt should be able to replace that energy in 2 seconds (battery charge acceptance not withstanding).
__________________






  Reply With Quote