View Single Post
Old 11-24-2014, 10:20 AM   #60 (permalink)
Madact
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 120

Emerald - '97 Honda Civic CXi
90 day: 40.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 53 Times in 32 Posts
OK, so here's the specs for two variants, the (sane) "single length 2-step tri-y" and the (questionable) "double length 3-step tri-y".

--- Megaphone Collector Specs ---( Diffuser or Diverging Cone Shape )---
*** Note: this will common to both designs, and matches the "Best HP/TQ Tuned Collector Length" from the mid-range calculations at realistic EGT. To save space, the last 4"-6" would be flex tube with an interlock liner.
Diameter= 1.5 taper to 2.5 Length= 16 inches

--- 2-Step "Single length" TRI-Y Pipe Specs ---

1st Y-Segment 1st Step Dia. inches= 1.375 Length= 13.5
2nd Y-Segment 3rd Step Dia. inches= 1.625 Length= 13.5
Combined Total of all Segment Lengths = 27 inches long
Including megaphone and 2" for cat. flange, -3" for exhaust runners inside the head = 42"

--- 3-Step "Double length" TRI-Y Pipe Specs ---

1st Y-Segment 1st Step Dia. inches= 1.375 Length= 27
1st Y-Segment 2nd Step Dia. inches= 1.5 Length= 13.5
2nd Y-Segment 3rd Step Dia. inches= 1.625 Length= 13.5
Combined Total of all Segment Lengths = 54 inches long
Including megaphone and 2" for cat. flange, -3" for exhaust runners inside the head = 69"

And how, might you ask, do you fit all that between the radiator and the engine? Here's one way :

(Note: Y merges are marked / tied together with the green tape. The 'pipe' is 15mm plastic-foam "gap filler" as used for sealing building cracks, in case you were wondering - actual diameter more like 16mm)






Madness? ... THIS! IS! SPARTAAAAAA!

But more seriously, using the aforementioned ram horn header as an "as far as you can push it" scenario:
* The ram horn header has all the ports taking a sharp turn (looks like 1D) straight out of the port, while this only has a 1.5D turns starting 4" from the port.
* Cylinders 2 and 3 have a similar amount of total bend at a similar radius to the ram horn header.
* Cylinders 3 and 4 have a bit more total bend than the ram horn, but can use much more 'swoopy' curves.

So, another question comes to mind... can a ram horn header only get away with this much bend because the 'ram horn' itself is a constant, steady turn? Or is having straight sections between the bends a good thing? In either case, next thing I'll try is a more traditional rams horn with primary Y merges just below the flange, and extra length from swoopyness below - but that's for another day.

-----
EDIT:

And I just realised I put the primary merges at 27" from the exhaust valve, rather than 40.5" - whoops! Just imagine them paralleling thier respective partners a little further before merging. And that the lower section might be better if it spiralled (like the Mazda header) rather than taking an S-bend. That's what comes of doing modelling after midnight I suppose ...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	header_1.jpg
Views:	440
Size:	64.3 KB
ID:	16488   Click image for larger version

Name:	header_2.jpg
Views:	439
Size:	64.3 KB
ID:	16489   Click image for larger version

Name:	header_3.jpg
Views:	431
Size:	64.5 KB
ID:	16490  

Last edited by Madact; 11-24-2014 at 10:29 AM..
  Reply With Quote