View Single Post
Old 11-30-2014, 10:33 AM   #55 (permalink)
sendler
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
From the article linked in the first post:
.
"Merely generating the relatively small proportion of our energy that we consume today in the form of electricity is already an insuperably difficult task for renewables: generating huge amounts more on top to carry out the tasks we do today using fossil-fuelled heat isn't even vaguely plausible."
.
"Even if one were to electrify all of transport, industry, heating and so on, so much renewable generation and balancing/storage equipment would be needed to power it that astronomical new requirements for steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage etc etc would appear."
.
"The scale of the building would be like nothing ever attempted by the human race."
.
.
.
We need to start now. As a One World Race. And focus the current 200 years of remaining fossil fuel energy wealth immediately toward a complete revamping () of the infrastructure. And go all in with our second primordial energy gift, Nuclear Fission, to buy us another 300 years to bridge the gap to 100% renewables and Fusion when that runs out.
.
We are going to need some mighty long extension cords to power enough electric machinery to replace our fossil fuel powered farming equipment. We have 200 years. Will we do it?
  Reply With Quote