View Single Post
Old 12-01-2014, 12:18 PM   #28 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
...just like a research hospital working on an ebola vaccine doesn't help children living a block away from it.
Why doesn't it? Unless you're absolutely certain that the Ebola virus is going to politely stay in Africa.

As to the rest, that's a question of economic philosophy, not quality of medical care. But I could note that there are really two distinct kinds of medicine. There's what you probably think of as medicine, treating individual patients who are sick or injured. Then there's the whole spectrum of public health, the goal of which is to keep people from needing medical care in the first place. Developing vaccines, whether for Ebola, polio, or measles, reducing smoking, figuring out what actually causes illnesses, etc. Cost-effective, available to the public either free or at little cost, if they choose to use it.


Quote:
And how much medical research is entirely privately funded?
Hard to say exactly about entirely, since many projects receive a mix of public & private funding. But per Google, something like 60% is private.
Quote:
Public research spending in the United States climbed to $51.4 billion in 2010, and accounted for about 41 percent of the country's total research spending. (U.S. Medical Research Spending Drops While Asia Makes Gains - US News )
  Reply With Quote