View Single Post
Old 12-13-2014, 10:11 AM   #40 (permalink)
ennored
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Motor City
Posts: 273
Thanks: 0
Thanked 213 Times in 132 Posts
Something in that series of "buses" doesn't add up.

.88 Cd to .36 by just rounding the front? That doesn't agree with other known Cd's I've seen (NASA and others).

I think the claims of an Airstream being about 30% better than a "normal" trailer are probably close, some from a better Cd, and some from a smaller frontal area. Which is also in the same ballpark as one of the NASA studies where they rounded the front of a boxtruck. 30% better than .88 is .62, way off .36.

Which is all just speculation. No real wind tunnel tests = no real number. Seems like there isn't one out there.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ennored For This Useful Post:
ecoTex (12-13-2014)