Quote:
Originally Posted by jkv357
|
OK, let's look at what's in that video gallery:
Perpetual Motion Machine posted 11.18.14 (a whiteboard video, no video of car, or production)
The Elio In The Snow posted 04.29.14
The Elio On FOX & Friends posted 04.29.14
Engine posted 09.13.13 (computer animated)
P4 Visits The Plant posted 11.18.14 (conceptual prototype drives through completely empty plant)
Try Elio On For Size posted 09.30.14 (videos of people sitting in the P4 conceptual prototype)
Elio At The Albuquerque International Baloon Fiesta posted 11.14.14 (P4 conceptual prototype on display)
hmmmmm .... notice anything?
Let's scroll down to the picture gallery.
Here's the first one:
http://www.eliomotors.com/wp-content...3.50.48-PM.png
And it's captioned: The Next Generation Elio. A
brand new picture of the 4th Prototype, in Creamsicle
hmmm .... a brand new picture ..... of the same orange P4 conceptual prototype they've been showing for more than a year.
They're not even updating their website.
I'm afraid they've run out of money, and are trying to "fake it till they make it" in the hope of getting that government loan guarantee.
I've also been thinking about that decision to make their own engine. Elio says they did it because the available powerplants were designed for heavier cars, and wouldn't be optimized for a car as light as the Elio.
That doesn't make sense. All it would take would be a camshaft change to optimize any crate engine for the Elio. The fact is, any mismatch would likely be too much torque. An engine designed for a car that weighs 2,500 lbs would need to make more torque than one designed for a 1,200 lb car, but too much torque (up to a point) would be a good thing, allowing short-shifting and keeping the revs low.
What does make sense, then? Factoring in the propensity I believe I've seen for hype, and smoke-and-mirrors, I can't help but wonder if Mr. Elio hasn't painted himself into a corner with the claims he's made, and is now paying the piper?
First, he promised 84 mpg. Remember, he made that promise before he even constructed a prototype. Looking at the differences between the P3 and P4 conceptual prototypes gives us a clue, I believe. They changed the headlights. Now, I believe the headlights on the P4 look much better, but Elio claims they made the change after aerodynamic testing. Think about that for a minute.
There is no way the P4's headlights aren't much more expensive than the P3's. That's working against another of Mr. Elio's promises: a 6,800.00 base price point, so
any added expense has to be an anathema to them. Any gains in mpg they might see from the aerodynamic improvements offered by the changed headlights would be minimal, so that suggests to me that they are having a hard time getting to that number, and are looking for the slightest edge, even if it cuts into their margins.
There's another Paul Elio promise that I believe could be part of the problem: 90% American-made. The engine is a major component. If you use an imported engine, what does that do to your 90% claim? Especially if you find there are other parts that can't be sourced here ... like, I don't know, maybe a transaxle that goes with that engine?
Here's the thing. The fact that Paul Elio made those promises: 84 mpg, 90% America-made, 6,800.00 base price, before he had even built a prototype, before he knew what engine he'd be using, speaks to a "fake it till you make it" mentality that concerns me more and more.
Would you be any less interested in an Elio if it got 74 mpg, was 80% American-made, and had a 7,300.00 base price? I wouldn't. That's still a massive improvement over anything else that's out there.
Now, though, if Elio delivers anything less than what has been promised, they look like failures. They've painted themselves into a very small corner.
They have someone manning their Facebook page 24 hours a day. They update that page multiple times each day, but with recycled material. They haven't put anything new on their webpage in months, yet they solicit funds constantly.
Not good.