View Single Post
Old 12-26-2014, 01:26 PM   #16 (permalink)
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,696 Times in 1,514 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by roosterk0031 View Post
2.3 EB is going into the Explorer & mustangs so I would think it would be good base engine in the 150. 270 hp 300ft lbs torque. 2 less cylinders, 1 less turbo (assuming v6's are twins) seem like a good setup for 95% of US truck owners.
Makes sense. And comparing it to a V6, there is an advantage due to the lower amount of internal frictions in a 4-cyl layout, increasing the efficiency.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobb View Post
Now with the bigger trucks the smaller engine wont cut it if its being used for work vs a passenger vehicle.
Gearing also plays an important role. Anyway, in many other markets, 4-cyl high-speed turbodiesels up to 3-litre have been widely used in work trucks up to Class 5 due to their lower purchase cost and lower tax incidences when compared to bigger engines. As you may know, in many countries the vehicles are taxed for their engine displacement.
  Reply With Quote