View Single Post
Old 01-16-2015, 04:57 AM   #19 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,443

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
I lost 10% of my weight in that time frame, by accident and by not exercising. I'm trying to gain it back.

I agree with RH77 saying weight reduction doesn't matter much. It doesn't really, unless the vehicle is going to have a proportional reduction in engine size. If a manufacturer reduces weight, they will keep the same powerful engine so the brochure can boast of faster quarter mile times, because we all run the quarter mile sprint as we take Johnny to daycare. The consumer tends to demand higher performance over fuel efficiency. Consumers will have to change their priorities for manufacturers to do anything meaningful with weight reduction.

You'll know we're headed in the right direction when you see more commercials touting efficiency or environmentalism than "Zoom, Zoom". I don't watch commercials, so let me know when this happens, please.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote