View Single Post
Old 01-23-2015, 11:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
kir_kenix
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Regarding the NASA article...

"In their study, they stipulate that in excess of 5% of the cattle shipped to feeder lots die before or shortly after arrival from shipping fever."

Absolutely no way that ANY cattle lot anywhere loses 5% of them in the first few days. That would literally run hundreds of thousands of dollars in loss for a small lot. Millions upon millions in any of the larger lots. An average loss is somewhere around 2-2.5% of cattle for the entire duration of them living there. Some come in sick (they will take the risk on a rough looking feeder steer if the price is right...), some get sick there, some break legs, others seem to commit suicide, etc etc.

Also:

"There will be some significant changes in livestock trailers in the not-too-distant future," says Saltzman. "The technology is there. Now it's just a matter of economic pressure being applied to make it cost effective for the industry to change its style."

I hope this is true. Judging from the way this industry works, I think it will be slow and take decades. I could see the semi's that haul pigs going this route though eventually. They haul them oinkers a looooong ways sometimes, and they really pack them in there.
  Reply With Quote