View Single Post
Old 01-27-2015, 06:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I would tend to agree with John's hypothesis. The more you EOC the more voltage you loose, and that energy then has to come from the alternator. It takes around 7hp for a small car to cruise and an 80A alternator can output 1.5hp, if the alternator has a lot to do you can see that can be a big hit to economy.

When UFI got a battery twice as big as stock, my MPG went up by as much as 15%, I charge it at home and the alt has nothing to do for at least the first 140 miles.

If you've got a lightweight car with poor aero, I've found EOC to be ineffective.

If you've got a 2 ton van EOC works at freeway speeds. I've adding a solar panel to my 1.5 tonne van roof next week to offset the EOC battery drain. Personally, I expect significant gains. Right now I often EOnC out of kindness to the battery when the voltage is reading a bit low already.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
j12piprius (01-27-2015)