View Single Post
Old 02-01-2015, 06:01 PM   #239 (permalink)
Baltothewolf
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
Yes, but in numerous discussions on EM that position has been debated, with the argument being that the ECU will compensate. But here, my UG is suggesting that the ECU is not compensating. That I am running lean, consistently. That surprises me, and I am wondering why it is so, or if I am misunderstanding the meaning of this display. ... the coolant temp is low because the car had been sitting for over an hour after running...
I'm not sure why people would debate that. It's a proven science. The ECU may compensate a little bit, but it's designed to run at 14:1, regardless of what your intake temps are. So when you have less dense air and the ECU detects that you are running too rich, it will automatically drop fuel consumption. It's NOT changing the overall air/fuel ratio, just how much actual fuel is required to keep the desired 14:1. It's like human fat. You can be really fat and look huge, but you can also have someone that's skinny that weights the same if he is all muscle. Why? Because muscle is denser than fat. Warm air = fat, cold air = muscle.
__________________

  Reply With Quote