View Single Post
Old 02-15-2015, 01:03 AM   #100 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
I would rather take a 10% mpg hit over not being able to walk/ride atv's, or live my life due to not having enough safety equipment. Is this really even a debate, and why are we having it?
We're having the discussion because nothing in this world is off-limits for being questioned. It's the things we take for granted that should probably be re-examined and scrutinized.

There are many safety items that would make sense to do without if we could avoid a 10% reduction in MPG. We should be looking at the cost of various safety equipment and not only determine their impact to fuel economy, but in the total cost to produce, equip, and maintain on a vehicle. It could be that some safety equipment has a very low return and a very high price. Do headlights really need washers and wipers? Can their cost be justified?

This discussion is good because it shows how we have different perceptions of risk. For instance, cRiPpLe_rOoStEr said they would prefer to do without airbags and a shoulder belt, but finds great value in anti-lock brakes. My perception is that the shoulder belt has the most safety benefit and the least cost among those 3 things. It was the first thing to be included as standard safety equipment, so I would think that is the low-hanging fruit of increasing safety. Further advancements incrementally improve safety but increase in complexity. For my driving ability, I find anti-lock brakes to be of least importance. I'm practiced in feathering the brakes, and usually decide to either brake or steer, but rarely do both in an emergency. If I could choose 1 safety feature to omit, it would be ABS.

Eventually technology will improve safety so much that it will be cheaper to implement automatic driving functions than to continue to build cars with the expectation that error-prone humans will crash them.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote