View Single Post
Old 02-15-2015, 03:41 AM   #101 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I don't know if the debate at hand is safety vs MPG. I think it's about how much safer all these things make us, and if they're not making things safer, that money would perhaps save more lives if spent on public hospitals, better (safer) roads etc. Any MPG gains would just be a bonus - and if you believe in AGW, then perhaps more people will die long term as a result of short term safety.

I wonder how many people are killed (mostly on bikes) as a result of the ridiculous A pillar blind spots for example.

I remember a local magazine rolled a Toyota Kluger SUV in testing on a dirt road which they blamed on the ESP calibration.

__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 02-15-2015 at 05:24 AM..
  Reply With Quote