View Single Post
Old 03-02-2015, 04:51 PM   #20 (permalink)
Fat Charlie
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
My dad bought a Jazz (=Fit) Hybrid a few weeks ago.

Aha, there is your hybrid that was not designed to be more aerodynamical than a non-hybrid, apart from some details lile a slightly smaller grill (it does not need to be as big).

The Fit Hybrid is heavier, yet much more economical than the comparable CVT trannied Fit. It is also faster.
What's sad is how few other platforms have that done to them. By and large, hybrid isn't a powertrain choice, it's a statement! An adventure! A lifestyle choice!

In the overall fleet, they're adding hidden efficiency features as long as they think nobody will notice- or think other people are going to notice that they have them. Active grilles, stop/start and multi-displacement aren't visible, help on the EPA test and don't cost much. A whole hybrid system costs more to build, so it's sold as something separate. It's hard for customers to compare apples to apples if a conventional powertrain isn't available in the mpg chassis.

They need the mpg, but it still all comes down to marketing.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote