View Single Post
Old 03-06-2015, 10:00 PM   #108 (permalink)
mikeyjd
Master EcoModder
 
mikeyjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838

Matchbox - '93 Ford Festiva L
Team Ford
Last 3: 70.16 mpg (US)

Salamander - '99 Chrysler Concorde LXI
Team Dodge
90 day: 30.3 mpg (US)

Urquhart - '97 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 3.4L DLX
Pickups
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)

Smudge - '98 Toyota Tacoma
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)

Calebro - '15 Renault Trafic 1.25 dci
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
Modern direct injection can eliminate the throttle then add cylinder deactivation and variable cam profiles to that. A non-hybrid can also be optimized to have just enough power for cruising speed and the ability to add more power when needed.
What is missing on current cars with cylinder deactivation is the ability to lock it in and then add more throttle to put the motor in a more efficient throttle/rpm as soon as you add just a little throttle the computer kicks you out of cylinder deactivation.
The 2015 Chevy trucks now have direct injection and cylinder deactivation. I am interested in how well they might do in real world but would also like to see new engines built from the ground up with this in mind rather then add-ons to old motors which is what Chevy has done.
My friend Kyle has the 2015 Silverado with cyclinder deactivation. He says that he consistently gets 28mpg highway when he's trying to stay in cyclinder deactivation mode.
  Reply With Quote