View Single Post
Old 03-08-2015, 10:25 PM   #29 (permalink)
serialk11r
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Just around the corner? Probably not. There are no remotely efficient algorithms for computing Navier Stokes numerically. Computing power available has increased a thousandfold since they started using CFD.

It would be groundbreaking if someone figured out even an O(exp(n)) time way to do this, so I heard.

Considering the expense of building wind tunnels and supercomputers, it might be better to just give a few hundred million in grants to PDE and numerical analysis researchers. That would be a *lot* of funding. For better or for worse, academic mathematicians are pretty cheap.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
ChazInMT (03-09-2015)