View Single Post
Old 03-14-2015, 12:01 AM   #195 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
That's true, but face it: there are a lot of cars out there that a) cost more than even the $40K Australian Insight; and b) get far worse mpg. For instance
  • Cadillac Escalade: $72,970 - $91,875
  • Porsche Cayenne: $49,600 - $146,000
  • Range Rover: $69,220 - $102,920

The companies that make these seem to stay in business, so the cars must be economically viable, no?
When people buy one of the above, cost of ownership isn't on the radar, and at a wild guess, they're not sold at a loss. The Gen 1 perhaps could best be compared to the VW XL1, very economical, but only appealing to a handful that wanted to, and could afford to, make a different kind of statement. A main stream hybrid/Eco car has to address cost of ownership, profitability, desirability etc.
__________________






  Reply With Quote