View Single Post
Old 03-16-2015, 12:41 AM   #11 (permalink)
doviatt
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesheiman View Post
Interesting, if I have it right, the key point here seems to be that pressure is -lower- in the sunroof area, for example, than behind the car, which reverses the desired air flow (doh!).

However, I'm wondering -why- this is true...
A guess (please feel free to correct)
*) The roof and windshield area do not curve smoothly/continuously into each other, causing the windshield to "throw" the air over the sunroof and create a low-pressure/turbulence area

Yes, I'm considering the idea of reshaping/custom-creating the front/roof joining area (technical term for this?) to prevent said "throw" if this is the case.

The speed lost in the actual duct due to it likely not being perfectly smooth does seem to be a definite issue.
The reason it throws the air over the sunroof is purposeful, so that the occupants don't get blown around with the fast moving air coming into the sunroof. The low pressure above the sunroof is the design intent. Have you seen and wondered about the little flip up spoilers that pop up at the front of the opening when you open the sun roof? Additionally, throwing the air over the top helps lessen the drag, opposed to, if the air actually enters the cockpit area.

Every benefit has an opposing compromise.


Last edited by doviatt; 03-16-2015 at 12:48 AM..
  Reply With Quote